• About
    • Justin Hodge
    • Luke Ellis
  • Contact Us
  • Eminent Domain FAQs
  • Resources
    • Fair Market Value Considerations
    • Highest and Best Use
    • Highway Expansions
    • Pipelines
    • Power Lines
    • Water Rights
    • What is Eminent Domain?
  • Sitemap
  • Thank You

Texas Condemnation

~ Texas Eminent Domain Explained

Texas Condemnation

Category Archives: texas eminent domain

WTG Temple Transmission Pipeline – Williamson and Bell Counties

21 Friday Aug 2026

Posted by texascondemnation in Pipelines, texas condemnation, texas condemnation lawyer, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Texas Eminent Domain Lawyer, Texas Railroad Commission

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bell County, Condemnation, Eminent Domain, property rights, Texas, Williamson County

The WTG Temple Transmission pipeline will impact landowners in Williamson and Bell Counties. WTG has already begun sending offers to take permanent easements for the project. If you are a landowner who may be affected, here’s what you need to know.

Although the project is still in its early stages, WTG is actively seeking permanent easements to secure their preferred pipeline route. For landowners, accepting an initial offer without fully understanding the easement terms and potential damages could mean giving up valuable property rights.

If you have received a notice of survey, offer letter, or appraisal related to the WTG Temple Transmission Line, don’t assume WTG’s initial offer reflects the full value of your property. An experienced eminent domain attorney can evaluate the easement terms, identify potential damages to your property, and represent you against WTG to pursue the maximum compensation available.

At Marrs, Ellis & Hodge LLP, we have a track record of protecting Texas landowners’ rights and winning trials against pipeline companies. Our eminent domain attorneys understand the tactics pipeline companies use and can help you evaluate whether WTG’s offer fairly compensates you for the rights it seeks. Call (512) 215-4078 today to speak with one of our experienced attorneys.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

What Austin’s Light Rail Project Means for Property Owners

07 Friday Aug 2026

Posted by texascondemnation in High-Speed Rail, Highest and Best Use, Landowner Rights, texas condemnation, texas condemnation lawyer, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Texas Eminent Domain Lawyer

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Attorneys, Austin condemnation, Austin eminent domain lawyer, Condemnation, Eminent Domain, property rights, Texas, Texas Condemnation, texas eminent domain

Austin’s Light Rail Project is moving from planning to property taking. The Austin Transit Partnership (ATP) has already begun taking land, and more property owners can expect to receive survey requests, purchase offers, and other notices as the project moves forward.

The first phase of the project will span nearly 10 miles through North, Downtown, South, and East Austin. To make way for the rail line, stations, and maintenance facility, the project is expected to seize approximately 85 acres, displace dozens of businesses, remove hundreds of on-street parking spaces, and permanently reshape parts of the city.

Light rail development in East Riverside, Austin via Austin American-Statesman

With construction set to begin in 2027, time is of the essence. Austin’s Light Rail Project may lead to reduced property value, lost access, decreased business visibility, parking impacts, relocation costs, and other damages that may not be reflected in ATP’s initial offer. Before accepting an offer or signing any documents, speak with an experienced eminent domain attorney to identify damages that ATP may overlook.

For decades, Marrs, Ellis & Hodge LLP has represented Texas property owners in eminent domain and condemnation matters. If you have received a notice from the Austin Transit Partnership, call (512) 215-4078 today for a free consultation with one of our experienced eminent domain attorneys.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

Luke Ellis and Justin Hodge (Program Co-Chair) – Faculty at Houston Eminent Domain Conference

09 Wednesday May 2018

Posted by texascondemnation in Houston, Houston eminent domain, Pipelines, Politics, Property Rights, texas condemnation, texas condemnation lawyer, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Texas Eminent Domain Lawyer

≈ Leave a comment

Luke Ellis and Justin Hodge (Program Co-Chair), Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP, are both faculty at the upcoming Houston, Texas Eminent Domain: CLE International Conference on Thursday, May 10, 2018 and Friday, May 11, 2018.  Luke will be speaking on Thursday at 10:00 am on Texas Eminent Domain Legislative Reform Efforts and Justin will be speaking as part of a panel on Friday at 10:15 am on the Legal Impacts of Hurricane Harvey.   The full conference schedule can be found here.  We hope you can join us at the conference.

Screen Shot 2018-05-09 at 11.15.20 AM

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

Oil Pipeline Ruptures – Landowners Evacuate

21 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by texascondemnation in Pipelines, Property Rights, texas condemnation, texas condemnation lawyer, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Texas Eminent Domain Lawyer, Texas Railroad Commission, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bastrop County, Condemnation, Crane, Crude Oil, Diesel, Eminent Domain, Evacuation, Houston, Longhorn, Magellan, oil and gas, pipeline, Rupture, Spill, Takings

The Longhorn pipeline, a crude oil pipeline operated by Magellan Midstream Partners (“Magellan”), ruptured approximately 4 miles southwest of Bastrop, Texas on July 13, 2017. The pipeline transports crude oil from Crane, Texas to Houston, Texas, a distance of roughly 500 miles. A contractor was performing maintenance on the pipeline, which was operating when it ruptured. As a result, an estimated 1,200 barrels (50,400 gallons) of crude oil spilled into the surrounding area.

Residents within a 1-mile radius of the rupture were asked to evacuate while residents within a 2-mile radius were given the option to either evacuate or take shelter in their homes. FM 520, the nearby thoroughfare, was shut down in both directions.

When it ruptured, the Longhorn pipeline was running at or near its full capacity. The Longhorn pipeline is a large capacity pipeline capable of transporting upwards of 200,000 barrels of crude oil per day. A prolonged shutdown could potentially mean that suppliers would have to look elsewhere to get their crude oil transported to the Gulf Coast.

This is not the first spill involving a Magellan operated pipeline. In January, a pipeline transporting diesel fuel spilled roughly 45,000 gallons of diesel in Northern Iowa.

A significant portion of property takings in Texas are the result of oil and gas pipeline projects. Incidents such as this serve as a reminder that even after condemnation proceedings have concluded, pipelines can still carry risks and create health and safety concerns. Due to the hazardous nature of the products pipelines transport, the potential for accidents poses an enduring threat to crops, livestock, water supplies, and property values. Landowners would do well to keep these considerations in mind when approached by oil and gas companies seeking to obtain an easement across their land.

Written by Graham Taylor

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

Liberty County to be Epicenter of Grand Parkway Construction in 2018

14 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by texascondemnation in Grand Parkway, Liberty County, texas condemnation, texas eminent domain, TxDOT

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Eminent Domain, Grand Parkway, Highways, infrastructure, Liberty County, project, Traffic, Transportation, TxDOT

way Segments F and G. Courtesy of HoustonFreeways.com

With Construction on Segments H & I-1 of the Grand Parkway set to begin in 2018, it seems likely that a wave of eminent domain proceedings is imminent in Liberty County. The Right-of-Way acquisition process for this 37-mile long segment of the project is estimated to take 24 months and will involve approximately 375 parcels of land. Following standard practice, the Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”) will present the current landowners with a series of purchase offers. Should any of these landowners reject TxDOT’s offers, the State will exercise their power of eminent-domain to condemn properties they deem necessary for the project.

Segments H and I-1, located to the northeast of Houston, will run through Chambers, Harris, Liberty and Montgomery counties. Liberty County, however, will be the epicenter of the project with a large portion of the expansion taking place within its boundaries. As construction is right around the corner, Liberty County landowners with properties located in the project’s Right-of-Way have likely already received or will soon receive offers for their land from TxDOT.

The project will add two tolled lanes each direction between US 59 and Interstate 10 (“I-10”).

Construction will include the addition of 74 bridges, spread across the entire length of the project segment. The project is expected to cost $855 million and is anticipated to be completed in 2022.

Written by Graham Taylor

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

Legislature Bails Out Railroad Commission- Helps Landowners

07 Friday Jul 2017

Posted by texascondemnation in Pipelines, texas condemnation, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Texas Eminent Domain Lawyer, Texas Railroad Commission, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

budget increase, Condemnation, Constitution, Eminent Domain, landowner rights, pipeline, pipeline data, Pipelines, power of eminent domain, Texas Constitution, Texas Legislature, Texas Railroad Commission, TRC, United States Constitution

The Texas Railroad Commission (“TRC”), an agency that has suffered financial difficulties due to budget cuts and reduced revenues, recently received a budget increase of 46 percent ($79.6 million) in the recently ended legislative session. These budgetary increases will hopefully allow the TRC to improve upon their ability to be an effective resource for landowners and make pipeline data readily available to the everyday Texan. Pipeline construction often requires pipeline companies to use the power of eminent domain to condemn property, commonly referred to as a “taking.” Public access to information collected by the TRC is vital to keeping landowners aware of activities that could affect their property.

The budget increase follows a year that saw monthly budget cuts of over a million dollars, a hiring freeze, and the postponing of desperately needed technological updates. In light of these financial difficulties, the TRC was forced to limit their operations to two core functions, the permitting and inspection of wells. Another one of the TRC’s functions is the issuance of T-4 permits which grants pipeline constructors the common carrier status required to exercise the power of eminent domain. A vital component of fulfilling this function is to maintain a public database of pipeline easements in the State of Texas.

The increased funding is intended, in part, to improve programs for well plugging, oil field clean up, and pipeline safety by financing the hiring of additional staff. The TRC’s staff is capped at 827 employees. Presently, the TRC is roughly 150 employees short of that maximum number. Additionally, the TRC was granted one-time authorization to retain nearly $40 million in revenue collected through its administration of the Natural Gas Utility Pipeline Tax. Roughly $27.6 million of that money will also be used to hire additional employees. The remainder will be used to provide salary increases.

An additional purpose of the budget increase is to continue, and hopefully expedite, the drawn-out process of updating the TRC’s computers and digitizing decades of oil and gas records which include pipelines constructed with and without the power of eminent-domain in the State.

In addition to updating its computer systems and digitizing historical records, the TRC provides an interactive map, accessible to the public, that tracks existing and operational pipelines throughout the State. The data represented by the interactive map may not always be current. This ambiguity diminishes the capacity of Texans to appreciate the scope of pipeline activity and its effect on their lives and property. One day, perhaps, the TRC will expand the functionality of its interactive map to include planned pipelines. This would allow landowners to determine whether a project under development will impact their property.

Landowners, under both the U.S. and Texas Constitutions, are entitled to just compensation when their land is taken. These database improvements can help begin to level the playing field between landowners and powerful oil and gas interests by keeping landowners current on projects that could impact their property rights.

– Co-Authored by Graham Taylor and Justin Hodge

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

‪Vote to support to end #eminentdomain ‬for private gain. YES on SB 740 @loiskolkhorst

18 Tuesday Apr 2017

Posted by texascondemnation in common-carrier status, Denbury, Pipelines, Politics, SB 747, texas condemnation, texas condemnation lawyer, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Texas Eminent Domain Lawyer, Texas Transportation Commission

≈ Leave a comment

‪Vote to support to end #eminentdomain ‬for private gain. YES on SB 740 @loiskolkhorst

Please watch the “‘TRANS PECOS’ | TEASER” on Vimeo.

 

The website for “TRANS PECOS” can be viewed here.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

Texas Supreme Court Pipeline Ruling Sets back Texas Land Owner Rights

03 Friday Feb 2017

Posted by texascondemnation in common-carrier status, Denbury, Environmental Permitting, Landowner Rights, Pipelines, Politics, Property Rights, Supreme Court, texas condemnation, texas condemnation lawyer, texas eminent domain, Texas Eminent Domain Attorney, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Appellate Court, Common Carrier, Common Carrier Test, common-carrier status, Denbury, Denbury Green Pipeline, landowner rights, Landowners, Opinion, politics, property rights, Public Benefit, Public Use, supreme court of texas, Texas, texas property rights, Texas Rice Land Partners, Third Party Contract

According to the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 17 of the Texas Constitution, applications of the eminent-domain power must be for public use. Jurisdictions have developed legal and administrative structures which allow private interests limited uses of the power. For Texas pipelines, the granting of eminent-domain authority can only take place when a project fulfills certain requirements. Chief among these is the ability to prove that the pipeline has a public use, meaning it is not being built exclusively for and used only by the entity condemning the land. Statewide, the common-carrier definition, and the derivative test determining whether the definition can describe a given pipeline, is used to establish and enforce the public use requirement.

In the recently decided Denbury Green Pipeline – Texas, LLC v. Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., the Texas Supreme Court clarified the access conditions for common-carrier status. In 2015, an appellate court established two additional barriers to common-carrier status. First, it held that a pipeline’s common carrier status must result from an examination of the intent of the constructing party to use the pipeline for public benefit at the onset of the project’s contemplation. Second, the pipeline’s use must serve a “substantial” public interest. The Supreme Court decision reversed these two holdings, the first on the grounds that it misinterpreted case law, and the second because it proceeded beyond the limits of precedent. The Supreme Court also held that Denbury’s post-construction product transportation contracts with third parties, and the fact that certain third parties would retain product title, was sufficient to evidence public use and therefore common-carrier status after the pipeline is built. This opinion is a significant blow to Texas landowner rights.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

New TxDOT Plan “CityMAP” Presents New Alternatives to Reduce Congestion

24 Friday Jun 2016

Posted by texascondemnation in Landowner Rights, Property Rights, Texas Department of Transportation, texas eminent domain, TxDOT

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

CityMAP, Congestion, Dallas, Dallas Master Assessment Plan, economic development, highway development, Landowner's Bill of Rights, Texas Property Code, traffic efficiency

Landowner's Bill of Rights TX

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) recently announced a new plan called CityMAP which outlines the department’s initiatives to address Dallas’ current and future transportation issues. CityMAP, short for Dallas City Master Assessment Plan, constitutes a change in direction for TxDOT, which has a long tradition of attempting to resolve congestion issues by funding road-expansion projects. After years of mixed results, the department has decided a change in methodology was required.

A major finding emphasized by the report was the fact that many Dallas highways currently function as physical barriers that isolate neighborhoods, making them nearly inaccessible, and severely limiting economic opportunities. The report suggested that removing highways or highway sections, or applying modifications such as lowering highway might help improve access, which could in turn spur economic development.

The study projects that at its current growth rate, the number of drivers will surpass the capacity of the highway system by 2040, despite a number of active highway-expansion projects. Such research, combined with a new focus on urban development, has led to a shift from highway traffic, to city, or urban related traffic. The thought is that making the city more suitable for cyclists or pedestrians would cause citizens to walk or bike with greater frequency, which would decrease the overall number of cars on the road and improve traffic efficiency.

But how will complete abandonment of these highways impact the landowners who lost their property to the original highway construction? Subchapter E of the Texas Property Code may have the solution.

To view the Texas Landowner’s Bill of Rights, click here.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…

Transfer of Pipeline Easements Cannot Be For Private Use

10 Friday Jun 2016

Posted by texascondemnation in Pipelines, texas condemnation, texas eminent domain, Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Allen v. Enbridge, Aycock v. Houston Lighting and Power Co., Cantu v. Cent. Power & Light co., Condemnation, Eminent Domain, pipeline, pipeline easements, Private Benefit, private use, Proposed Easement Agreement, Texas Utilities Code, Tyler Court of Appeals

In Allen v. Enbridge G & P, L.P., Enbridge G & P brought condemnation action against the Allens for the purpose of securing two easements, one permanent and one temporary, from the landowners. Enbridge required the easements for the installation and maintenance of a pipeline which would carry natural gas products. A permanent easement of 50 feet in width would contain the pipeline and a 25-foot easement would be used as a temporary workspace. At the special commissioners’ hearing, Enbridge was awarded the easements. Mr. and Mrs. Allen filed objections, and the proceeding was brought to the trial court.

On appeal, Mr. and Mrs. Allen brought two issues, the second of which concerned the ability of the easement holder both to maintain the benefits and burdens of the Plaintiff and Defendants, and allow an assignee to do likewise. Paragraph X of Enbridge’s Second Amended Petition contained the following:

“The benefits and burdens of this Permanent Easement shall be binding upon and shall ensure to the benefit of Plaintiff and Defendants, and to their respective successors and assigns.”

Mr. and Mrs. Allen argued that this language allowed Enbridge to assign the property for private use, rather than strictly public use, and was therefore in violation of the constitutional prohibition against private use takings. The Tyler Court of Appeals found that though “certain easements may be assigned to a third party, that third party’s use cannot exceed the rights expressly conveyed to the original easement holder.” Cantu v. Cent. Power & Light co. It also found that “companies possessing the right to condemn private property for a public use cannot do what they please with the land condemned, but only what is reasonably necessary to carry out the purpose for which the land is taken,” and that “anything beyond this is not the taking of private property for public use, but the taking of private property for private use.” Aycock v. Houston Lighting and Power Co.

Because the language in the Second Amended Petition permitted Enbridge to assign the easement without restriction, the Court of Appeals modified the trial court’s final judgment by restricting the easement’s assignment only to an assignee that qualifies as a transporter of natural gas as defined in Texas Utilities Code, Section 121.001(a).”

In summary, landowners should diligently look at the language of the pipeline company’s proposed easement to make sure it cannot be transferred for a private benefit.

To view the case, click here.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Like this:

Like Loading…
← Older posts

Stay up to date with Justin and Luke

texascondemnation

texascondemnation

Luke Ellis and Justin Hodge are partners with Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP. Justin heads the firm's eminent domain practice in the Houston office. Luke heads the firm's eminent domain practice in the Austin office. Luke Ellis is widely recognized as one of Texas’s top young lawyers—and one of the top lawyers of any age practicing in the area of eminent domain. Mr. Ellis has broad experience and has enjoyed success in many types of civil litigation. Justin Hodge is a trial lawyer who represents Texas landowners in condemnation, eminent-domain, and real-estate lawsuits. He represents landowners in condemnation proceedings, not the governmental authorities or private companies taking property. Mr. Hodge has handled complex condemnation and eminent-domain cases throughout the State of Texas. If you have questions about any of the issues raised in this blog, we invite you to discuss them with us at jhodge@mehlaw.com or lellis@mehlaw.com.

View Full Profile →

RSS feed: TexasCondemnation TexasCondemnation

  • Breaking Up Is Hard To Do: Tex App Says Target’s Slice Of A Shopping Center Taking Can’t Be Severed From The Rest October 8, 2026
    Usually, when “unity of use” comes up in an eminent domain case, the property owner is the one arguing that …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • UPDATE: The PUC Approved the Howard-Solstice 765kV High Voltage Powerline September 25, 2026
    The Howard-Solstice Transmission Line is no longer a proposal. The Public Utility Commission of Texas approved the 765kV transmission line, …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • West Texas Landowners Face a New Threat From the Longshore-to-Drill Hole 765 kV Project September 11, 2026
    In West Texas, the booming demand for power from data centers and oil and gas operations is fueling a massive …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • The Dinosaur-to-Longshore 765 kV Project Is Coming, and Texas Landowners Could Pay the Price September 4, 2026
    The Public Utility Commission of Texas recently approved Oncor’s proposed Dinosaur Switch to Longshore 765 kV Transmission Line. The proposed …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • WTG Temple Transmission Pipeline – Williamson and Bell Counties August 21, 2026
    The WTG Temple Transmission pipeline will impact landowners in Williamson and Bell Counties. WTG has already begun sending offers to …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • What Austin’s Light Rail Project Means for Property Owners August 7, 2026
    Austin’s Light Rail Project is moving from planning to property taking. The Austin Transit Partnership (ATP) has already begun taking …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • The Howard-Solstice Transmission Line: What You Should Know July 30, 2026
    A transmission line can cost you far more than the land covered by the easement. If your property is affected by …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Massive New Transmission Lines Are Headed Across Texas July 10, 2026
    Texas’ first 765-kilovolt transmission lines could permanently reshape the land they cross. If your property falls along the proposed Bell …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Justin Hodge, Kyle Baum, and Hannah Sliva Speak at No East Loop BBQ Social in Bryan, Texas April 15, 2025
    Last week, Justin Hodge, Kyle Baum, and Hannah Sliva had the privilege of speaking at the April No East Loop …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Justin Hodge Interviewed Regarding the Trident Intrastate Pipeline Project on Houston Matters February 10, 2025
    Justin Hodge, Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP partner, was interviewed on Houston Matters with Craig Cohen regarding the upcoming Kinder …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation

Follow Our Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Twitter Updates

Tweets by JMEHCondemn

Twitter Updates

Tweets by TXCondemnation

Twitter Updates

Tweets by JMEHLaw

TexasCondemnation

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Pages

  • About
    • Justin Hodge
    • Luke Ellis
  • Contact Us
  • Eminent Domain FAQs
  • Resources
    • Fair Market Value Considerations
    • Highest and Best Use
    • Highway Expansions
    • Pipelines
    • Power Lines
    • Water Rights
    • What is Eminent Domain?
  • Sitemap
  • Thank You

Powered by WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...
%d