• About
    • Justin Hodge
    • Luke Ellis
  • Contact Us
  • Eminent Domain FAQs
  • Resources
    • Fair Market Value Considerations
    • Highest and Best Use
    • Highway Expansions
    • Pipelines
    • Power Lines
    • Water Rights
    • What is Eminent Domain?
  • Sitemap
  • Thank You

Texas Condemnation

~ Texas Eminent Domain Explained

Texas Condemnation

Tag Archives: Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge

Inside Out: A New Way of Looking at the 2012 Presidential Debate

04 Thursday Oct 2012

Posted by texascondemnation in Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, alternative energy, Blog, Condemnation, debate, elections, Eminent Domain, GOP, health care policies, Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge, Keystone pipeline, Keystone XL, News, Obama, oil and gas, Opinion, Pipelines, politics, presidential debate, property rights, Romney, Texas Condemnation, TransCanada, trickle down effect

“All of the increase in natural gas and oil has happened on private land, not on government land. On government land [Obama’s] administration has cut the number of permits and licenses in half. If I’m president, I’ll double them and bring the oil offshore from Alaska and I’d bring that pipeline in from Canada … I want to make America, North America, energy independent so we can create jobs.” Among the many contentious points of discussion during last night’s presidential debate was TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline. Obviously, a number of questions and criticisms arise in response to last night’s debate on these issues.

However, in speaking for or against these issues of progress versus sustainability, one particular player in the game was left unnoticed: the landowners. Not once in the debate did either Governor Romney or President Obama mention the property rights of land and business owners who face the real consequences of these projects. Furthermore, only a select few social media outlets even mention this controversial subject. Instead, we speak of tax reforms and the structure of the economy. We speak of health care and education. Don’t get me wrong; all of these issues are important, but how does anyone successfully solve a problem by looking at it only from the outside in? Our political leaders need to address the issues that concern our nation by pressing past the barriers of the outside perspective. Looking inside out, we find how cuts or increases in taxes can affect asset value, interest rates, and incentives to invest. We see how the trickle-down effect of the economy never reaches the average middle class landowner. Changes in health care policies may affect how landowners respond to oil spills, like the 12 suffered by Keystone XL just last year.

There is no right way to make policies, but there is a way to ensure the basic rights of property owners. The answer is a middle ground. We must abandon partisan bias and focus on the real issues at hand with an eye that sees from the inside out rather than the outside in. In the end, it is the landowners’ rights that must be protected.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Importance of Property Rights and a Partial History of How We Got Them

24 Monday Sep 2012

Posted by texascondemnation in JMEH Law News, Property Rights

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, common law, Condemnation, contract rights, Eminent Domain, Gulf Coast Project, Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge, just compensation, Kelo, Keystone pipeline, Latin America, Magna Carta, oil and gas, Pipelines, property rights, Sir Edward Coke, Texas, TransCanada

Eminent domain has gotten a lot of press recently. A major catalyst was the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, which allowed a city to take private property from individual landowners so that it could be redeveloped for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and thereby increase tax revenues. The Court announced that taking land to allow private companies to redevelop it counted as a “public use” under the Constitution’s Takings Clause.

Public outcry was loud and sustained. Many states, including Texas, passed anti-Kelo legislation to prevent the use of eminent domain for “economic development.” Ironically, the land where Susette Kelo’s little pink house once stood was never redeveloped. Pfizer decided not to go forward with its $350-million research center, nixing the city’s plans for retail shops, condos, and hotels surrounding the facility.

More recently, TransCanada received approval for its Gulf Coast Project, a 485-mile pipeline running from Oklahoma to the Texas coast. TransCanada’s ultimate goal is to build a nearly 2700-mile, $2.3-billion pipeline connecting Canada’s tar sands to Texas’s refineries. The project poses serious environmental concerns, including damage to aquifers and deteriorating air quality from refining tar sands, which critics claim are dirtier than other crudes to refine. Landowners in Texas and elsewhere are up in arms about having a foreign company run toxic tar over their property. The pipeline’s supporters respond that the project promotes U.S. energy security, reasoning it’s better to consume crude oil from North American producers than higher-priced oil from countries that do not share American values.

In takings cases, the public and the media usually fixate on environmental issues and on whether the government or private taker has a “right to take” the land. No doubt, those issues are very important.

But another issue is critical: “just compensation” for the landowner whose property is taken. Today most people ignore this issue. Most of us probably assume that what counts as “just compensation” isn’t controversial, leaving it to our elected Texas Supreme Court to define “just compensation” and “market value” in ways that would surprise most Texans.

Rather than criticize how the supreme court applies the Takings Clause, today I’d like to share a couple of stories about the importance of property rights—and the luck and bravery it took to develop the process for landowners to get any compensation at all.

A Personal Story—and the Importance of Property Rights

Property rights are a big deal in my home. My wife is originally from Latin America. She has wonderful memories of her early childhood: picking mangos right off the tree as an after-school snack, talking with friends as everyone chewed on sugar cane, going to festivals in her small village, and playing with her nine brothers and sisters. (As for having 10 kids, her mom explains, with a wink, that no one in the town had TV during the 60s and 70s.) My wife’s family wasn’t among the super rich, but they had a productive farm and ranch lands that her father had worked his whole life to earn.

But in the 1980s, a civil war ravaged the country, and communist guerrillas confiscated the lands of her family, dramatically changing the trajectory of their lives. My wife and several members of her family members emigrated to the United States, becoming permanent residents and eventually American citizens. They were never able to return to their lands. Even after the war ended, government officials were too corrupt or too weak to help my father-in-law recover his property. Sadly judges and other officials in her native country, as in many places, continue to help shysters cheat people out of their land and inheritance in exchange for bribes and other favors. Her country remains poor, and gangs routinely kidnap people and steal their property, often with police cooperation.

These experiences help explain my wife’s immense love for the United States. She constantly reminds our boys and me of how lucky we are to live in a country with so many educational and cultural opportunities—and a wonderful tradition of respecting property rights and the rule of law. She encouraged me to attend law school and to study property rights in other countries.

My wife’s story shows the importance of property rights in the real world. When governments are too weak or corrupt to protect their citizens’ property, or when the state itself can take private property without paying for it, what incentives do people have to take care of their lands or work to create wealth? People need real guarantees that they will be able to enjoy the fruits of their labor with their family and friends. Otherwise, it’s the law of the jungle, where the strong prey on the weak. As Hobbes put it, such a life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” And as William Bernstein notes in The Birth of Plenty, the right to property is the right that guarantees all others: “Individuals without property rights are susceptible to starvation, and it is much easier to bend the fearful and hungry to the will of the state.” If the state can arbitrarily threaten a person’s property, “that power will inevitably be used to intimidate those with divergent political and religious views.”

The Rule of Law: An Accident and a Hero

The Big Bang in property rights—including a landowner’s right to “just compensation” for takings—was something of an accident. Following a failed campaign to regain Normandy, King John of England stole property and raised rents on his subjects—but did so without following the proper proceedings, or what we now call “due process.” The barons rebelled, occupied London, and forced John in 1215 to sign the Magna Carta. For the first time, everyone was subject to the law, even the king—who could no longer deprive any free person of life, liberty, or property without due process. And when His Majesty took private property, he would have to pay for it.

Yet strong property rights did not flower overnight. It took brave judges willing to stand up to royalty. Sir Edward Coke was a pioneer in promoting an independent judiciary. In 1606, James I faced accusations that he’d broken promises to transfer property to a bishop. The king asked the judges to delay the verdict until he could personally discuss the case with them, which seems outrageous today but was common practice at the time. Coke refused and convinced his fellow judges to deny the king’s request. The king was not amused, so he summoned the judges to his chambers and demanded they reverse their ruling. While Coke’s fellow judges cowered, Coke calmly told the king that he was bound to honor his duty as a judge, and he refused to cave in to the king’s request. Coke was later removed from office and suffered the indignity of seeing many of his opinions erased from the law books, but his immense popularity as a defender of the common man saved his life. As Bernstein explains, “Now, for the first time in European history, a judge had faced down royal power.” Coke’s Institutes of the Laws of England, which articulated what is known as “the common law,” was especially influential in the American colonies.

The common-law tradition—which views the protection of property rights as the duty of an independent judiciary—was the foundation for the great wealth and freedoms enjoyed in many countries around the world. The common law focused on following legal precedents and maintaining its separation from the other branches of government. These features were critical to developing meaningful property rights. Property owners could point to the rights and guarantees applied in previous cases—and, just as important, the separation of powers meant that a person seeking to take away another’s property rights would have to convince not only the king or a powerful legislator but also the judiciary. In contrast, it was much easier to take away property rights in civil-law countries, where the decisions of a single branch (the legislature) were supreme. It is no surprise, then, that England and America were the first countries to create great wealth—the kind of material wealth never before seen in the history of the world. When government must pay “just” and “adequate” compensation for the property it takes, and when courts enforce property and contract rights, people are more willing to take care of the property they already own and to make investments to increase their holdings.

– by Christopher Johns, partner at Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge, LLP (cjohns@jmehlaw.com)

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Whose Land Is It Anyway? – A Rising Tide of Eminent Domain Cases in Texas

14 Friday Sep 2012

Posted by texascondemnation in Pipelines, Politics, Property Rights

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

2012, alternative energy, Austin condemnation, Austin eminent domain lawyer, Condemnation, Eminent Domain, Houston condemnation, Houston eminent domain lawyer, Johns Marrs Ellis & Hodge, Keystone XL, Obama, oil and gas, property rights, Romney, Texas, Texas Condemnation, Texas condemnation lawyer, Texas eminent domain lawyer, TransCanada

Julia Trigg Crawford, a Northeast Texas farmer, and numerous landowners across Texas continue to fight for their property rights despite many losses. But what is the reason behind this sudden surge of condemnation cases? The first reason is the economy, the second is demographics. More and more monetary energy is directed towards the development of oil and gas across the state, mostly due to a boom in hydraulic fracturing. The growing population of Texas does not alleviate the problem either. As the issue gains a greater spotlight, so do the opposing views on the bigger question of the pros and cons of developmental progress in the United States. President Obama along with many environmentalists sway towards the cultivation of wind and solar energy, an investment in land safety. GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and the majority of privately owned oil and gas corporations find investing in the economy to be of greater value. The question is not who is right, but how to find a middle ground so that property owners can successfully maintain their land rights.

You can read more about this story at MySanAntonio or the Stateman.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Stay up to date with Justin and Luke

texascondemnation

texascondemnation

Luke Ellis and Justin Hodge are partners with Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP. Justin heads the firm's eminent domain practice in the Houston office. Luke heads the firm's eminent domain practice in the Austin office. Luke Ellis is widely recognized as one of Texas’s top young lawyers—and one of the top lawyers of any age practicing in the area of eminent domain. Mr. Ellis has broad experience and has enjoyed success in many types of civil litigation. Justin Hodge is a trial lawyer who represents Texas landowners in condemnation, eminent-domain, and real-estate lawsuits. He represents landowners in condemnation proceedings, not the governmental authorities or private companies taking property. Mr. Hodge has handled complex condemnation and eminent-domain cases throughout the State of Texas. If you have questions about any of the issues raised in this blog, we invite you to discuss them with us at jhodge@mehlaw.com or lellis@mehlaw.com.

Personal Links

  • Marrs Ellis & Hodge LLP

View Full Profile →

RSS TexasCondemnation

  • Texas Eminent Domain Conferences February 9, 2021
    Please consider attending the Virtual Austin Eminent Domain Conference on April 12-13th. You can register here. Assuming COVID numbers continue …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Texas High-Speed Rail: Legal Uncertainty in the Time of Pandemic April 17, 2020
    As most Texans are likely aware, plans to build a high-speed rail between Houston and Dallas have been in the …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • DART “Silver Line” May Damage Businesses in Dallas – Fox News 4 Features Justin Hodge September 28, 2019
    Dallas Fox 4 discusses the impact of the DART “Silver Line” on business owners and interviews Marrs Ellis & Hodge, …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Kinder Morgan Obtains Courtroom Victory, Can Proceed with Construction of Permian Highway Pipeline, Judge says. September 6, 2019
    In an end to a court room battle that will surely set back landowners, a Travis County District court recently …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Trump Administration Joins Chorus of Voices Calling for Criminalization of Pipeline Protests September 3, 2019
    The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”), a regulatory agency under the Transportation Department, released a recommendation this month …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • $1 Billion of Border Wall Funding Blocked by Federal Judge June 5, 2019
    Judge Haywood Gilliam, a U.S. District Court Judge based in Oakland, California put a stopper in the President’s border wall …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • New Executive Orders Seek to Shorten Pipeline Approval Process May 28, 2019
    President Trump issued two executive orders last month with the intent of speeding up the pipeline permitting process. The orders …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Texas Central Partner’s Houston to Dallas High-Speed Rail Project Derailed by a Leon County Judge? April 26, 2019
    As has been widely reported, Texas Central Partners (“TCP”), a privately owned, Dallas based company, has announced ambitious plans to …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • New Session, New Bills – The 2019 Legislature’s Push for Eminent Domain Reform April 3, 2019
    Texas landowner advocacy groups are working with State politicians to reform eminent domain. Eminent domain, though a deeply concerning issue …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation
  • Air Force Pollution Forces Farm to Liquidate March 15, 2019
    The owners of Highland Dairy Farm (“Highland”) in Clovis, New Mexico are being forced to close down due to chemical …Continue reading →
    texascondemnation

Follow Our Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Twitter Updates

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Twitter Updates

  • With the #Keystone decision looming, will the President propose a quid pro quo? wp.me/p2D4PK-3i via @JustinAHodge #Obama #Pipelines 7 years ago
  • City of #Austin may pay Whittington $14.1 million for downtown block wp.me/p2D4PK-3f via @JustinAHodge #TexasSupremeCourt 7 years ago
  • Court rules #EPA can withdraw mining permits wp.me/s2D4PK-196 via @JustinAHodge #Coal #Pollution 7 years ago
Follow @TXCondemnation

Twitter Updates

  • With the #Keystone decision looming, will the President propose a quid pro quo? wp.me/p2D4PK-3i via @JustinAHodge #Obama #Pipelines 7 years ago
  • City of #Austin may pay Whittington $14.1 million for downtown block wp.me/p2D4PK-3f via @JustinAHodge #TexasSupremeCourt 7 years ago
  • Court rules #EPA can withdraw mining permits wp.me/s2D4PK-196 via @JustinAHodge #Coal #Pollution 7 years ago
Follow @JMEHLaw

TexasCondemnation

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Pages

  • About
    • Justin Hodge
    • Luke Ellis
  • Contact Us
  • Eminent Domain FAQs
  • Resources
    • Fair Market Value Considerations
    • Highest and Best Use
    • Highway Expansions
    • Pipelines
    • Power Lines
    • Water Rights
    • What is Eminent Domain?
  • Sitemap
  • Thank You

Powered by WordPress.com.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: